Frank Heidlberger, Chair
The Division of Music History, Theory, and Ethnomusicology is a vibrant contributor to the College of Music. MHTE maintains a full range of academic programs from the bachelor's to the doctorate. In fact, the Ph.D. program, celebrating more than a half-century of activity, was the first in the university. Today more than 70 students are enrolled in its graduate programs.
The division offers the B.A. in Music with an emphasis in Music History; the B.M. in Music Theory, the Master of Arts in Music with concentrations in musicology, ethnomusicology, music theory, and musicology with an emphasis in early music performance; the Ph.D. in Music with concentrations in music theory, and musicology.
As a hub of academic activity, the division fosters a wide range of projects and initiatives. Students are encouraged to take advantage of our faculty's vast expertise in historical musicology, theory, and ethnomusicology. Division faculty members have been recognized with significant awards for outstanding teaching, research, service and the promotion of diversity in teaching and across campus. Read More
Danny Arthurs, Music Theory
Steven Friedson, Ethnomusicology
Margaret Notley, Music History
For additional information about our programs, please contact Prof. Frank M. Heidlberger, division chair, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
MHTE News and Events
Friday, October 17, Music Building, Room 321
Lecture: Robert Pearson
Title: Editors, Architects, and the Revival of Polyphony in Late-Victorian Britain
The modern-day early music movement can trace its British origins to the first quarter of the twentieth century, when a sudden interest in sixteenth-century music resulted in dozens of new editions, recordings, and theoretical writings. Sixteenth-century vocal music neatly accommodated itself to the musical culture of Victorian Britain, which largely defined itself around its tradition of madrigal singing societies and amateur choruses. Yet despite the obvious success of the revival by 1930, most audiences who were exposed to these efforts at first resisted; at least one amateur chorus disbanded entirely because, as its historian put it, “sixteenth-century music was severe diet” for Britain’s amateur singers. Unlike the imposing scholarly editions of sixteenth-century music that emerged from the continent at the turn of the century, British scholars’ editions prioritized practical music-making above all and therefore resistance from amateur performers was a real concern. Editors faced a theoretical problem with no ready solution: how can one present sixteenth-century music as it was understood in its own historical time but still concede the Victorian reality that music should be accessible to amateurs?
The first revivers of polyphony in Victorian Britain did not have a theoretical framework available to help them navigate this tension. However, polemical public debates about the revival of Gothic architecture seem to have informed how they thought about the role of artifacts of cultural heritage in modern society. These debates about Gothic architecture often concealed attitudes toward the rapidly changing role of Catholicism in England, and resonated especially with revivers of Catholic polyphony, many of whom were Catholic converts themselves. Editors such as Richard Terry, John Moore Capes prepared their editions from inside historic Catholic cathedrals, and the editor Edmund Fellowes’ own residence at St. George’s Chapel at Windsor had recently undergone a restoration project that brought the architectural debates close to home. By the time of Donald Francis Tovey’s editions of 1910 and 1917, the architectural debates were for the most part dormant, but the methodological framework they generated still shaped his approach to editing. In this paper, I will demonstrate how debates about architectural restoration and preservation in Late Victorian society can shed light on early twentieth-century editorial experiments with sixteenth-century polyphony.
Wednesday, October 22, Music Building, 321
Mary Channen Caldwell
Title: Singing to Learn and Learning to Sing: A Premodern Approach to Grammar and Religion
Songs for learning are essential to the culture of childhood—from the soundtrack of Sesame Street to the ABC Song, music helps young and old alike acquire and embody knowledge through repeated performance. Song at the most basic level of medieval education, however, has rarely received attention beyond the simple acknowledgment of its presence within cathedral and song schools. A group of sacred Latin songs surviving from the twelfth to the fourteenth century nevertheless signal the rich culture of learning songs in the lives of medieval school children, designed as they are to instill in performers and audiences rudimentary concepts of grammar and theology. This collection of rhymed, rhythmical, and sacred Latin songs is marked by two significant features: first, each song is structured around noun declensions, noun and adjective agreements, and verb conjugations; and second, each song shares the musical and textual scaffolding of a refrain.
These remarkable songs not only allow for the challenging exercise of fitting changing grammar patterns into rhythmical, rhymed poetry, but also provide an inherently repetitive, performative, and communal space for memorizing grammar through their refrain forms. In addition to the learning goals suggested by grammatically-shaped lyrics, these refrain songs are spiritually edifying. Preserved in sources including the well-known Notre Dame manuscripts of the thirteenth century and the fourteenth-century Moosburger Graduale, the music-poetic works serve as musical glosses for religious feasts special to the calendar of medieval children: the Feast of St. Nicholas, Christmas, the Feast of Fools, and the New Year. With their focus on devotional moments showcasing youth participation, these sacred grammar songs are the playful product of didactic impulses emerging equally from the schoolroom and the church. By fusing basic grammar and religious ideology onto ostensibly “fun” songs, performers are, like children singing along with Sesame Street, effortlessly engaged in informal yet deeply embodied learning.
Wednesday,November 19, 2014, Music Building, 321
Associate Professor, Musicology and Anthropology University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Title: A Bulgarian Rite of Spring: Bells, Mummers and Mana in "Balkansky'"s Cosmology for Social Change
Since 2009, the Bulgarian multimedia project “Balkansky,” a collaboration between graphic designer-photographer Ivo Hristov and graphic artist-composer Ivan Shopov, has released two concept albums of electronic dance music, Kuker (2009) and Orenda (2012), on the independent recording label Kuker Music, with accompanying music videos and artwork. As their titles suggest, both albums draw extensively upon nature worship, Christianity, and other belief systems, particularly apropos the mid-winter and springtide mummers called kukeri or survakari and the bells that are their sonic spiritual weapons. Drawing upon ethnomusicological fieldwork conducted with mummers, artists, bellmakers, and musicians between 2008 and 2013, my paper explores how Balkansky has cultivated and artistically repackaged key symbols and imagery of older calendrical customs and agrarian rites, communicating them back to the Bulgarian public in a contemporary popular culture format that reveals the artists’ cosmological manifesto for social change.
Joel Lester Residency, September 24-28
Below: Photographs from the Joel Lester Division Lecture on September 24, 2014; Photographer: Erin Lancaster
All lectures are open to the public.
12:00-1:20pm - MUTH 6680 (Theory Pro-seminar, Jackson) - Music Building, Room 290
Lecture Title: "Some Thoughts on Prolongation and Voice Leading in Post-Tonal Music."
2:00-2:50pm - MUTH 5350 (Analysis & Performance, Jackson) - Music Building, Room 288
Lecture Title: "Listening to and Performing a Violin Sonata."
4:00-5:00pm - MHTE Division lecture - Music Building, Room 321
Lecture Title: "Outer Form, Inner Form, and Other Musical Narratives in the First Movement of Beethoven's op. 14 no. 2."
Lecture followed by a reception in the Green Room.
3:30-4:50pm - MUTH 6710 (Analytical Systems I, Heidlberger) - Music Building, Room 321
Lecture Title: "A Half-Century Perspective on the History of Music Theory."
1:00-1:50pm - MUTH 5550 (Professional Writing, Slottow) - Music Building, Room 2006
Lecture Title: "Writing about Music Theory"
2:00-2:50pm - MUTH 5370 (Analytical Techniques III, Schwarz) - Music Building, Room 2006
Lecture Title: "Bartok's 'Diminished Fifth' (Mikrokosmos #101) and the Octatonic Scale"
9:15am-5:40pm - GAMuT conference, Music Building, Recital Hall.
2:00pm - 3:00pm - Joel Lester Keynote address: "From 'a' to "The."
For more details about the conference, visit The GAMuT Conference page